‘Nowadays people
begin by sneering at family life and institutions’ – How families are presented
in The Great Gatsby
In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel family relationships are
presented as losing meaning, becoming superficial and something of the past in
the new, tradition-breaking atmosphere of the Roaring 1920s.
While not the most obvious example of breakdown in families,
one of the most interesting things to note is the presentation of children
within the novel. This is mainly because children seem to be very absent from
the novel, emphasising the very adult atmosphere of the 1920s, where luxury,
adult parties and illegal alcohol were major parts of everyday life. The only
child to be featured is Daisy’s female child, Pammy. I refer to her as such and
not as a “girl” because of the way the characters and narrator speak about her,
with Nick referring to the girl as “it”, demonstrating the way that family
members are made to feel like possessions, which emphasises the theme of money
and ownership in the novel. This is further shown when Pammy is shown of to
Daisy’s guests like an act rather than a person, showing a need to be in
possession of nice things in the 1920s, and not having a good, motherly
relationship with her own daughter. The child is obviously neglected by mother
and father, with Tom Buchannan not mentioning her once throughout the entire
novel, even when she is present, instead he asks Nick about his job, showing
how he is more concerned with his friend’s successes rather than his own child.
Daisy does not have high hopes for her daughter, claiming ‘that’s the best
thing a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool’, showing how she
does not show any positivity towards the child’s ambitions, simply hoping that
she will be ignorant to the world and get married in order to lead a normal,
simple life. This can, however, be interpreted as Daisy wanting the child to be
ignorant for protection and in order to fit into society, showing concern about
the child’s future. Gatsby’s childhood relationship with his father is
different, with his father claiming, “Jimmy was bound to get ahead”, showing a
genuine pride for his own son and hopes for his future as opposed to Daisy’s
simple wish for her daughter to live comfortably and not necessarily be
successful at anything. Children are used as a device in the novel to show how
family members in the 1920s could be treated as superficial possessions to show
off, especially amongst the wealthy.
In conclusion, family relationships are negatively presented
by Fitzgerald as breaking down and becoming something to be measured by value
along with everything in the 1920s. Children are treated as possessions and
often neglected. Marriage is often abused and the characters form multiple
relationships, many of which end badly demonstrating how the 1920s was a time
of luxury and freedom, which often broke institution and the importance of
families.
Tristan
Tristan

No comments:
Post a Comment